You are viewing jaylake

Lakeshore - [cancer|religion] Atheism, cancer and me
An author of no particular popularity

Jay Lake
Date: 2009-12-24 05:55
Subject: [cancer|religion] Atheism, cancer and me
Security: Public
Tags:calendula, cancer, child, health, personal, religion
I've received various comments on my cancer in a religious context here and there. Almost all entirely well meant, and some well stated. As I mentioned yesterday, even my clinic advises coping through my faith.

Except I have no faith, in the sense that they mean the term. I am an atheist.

I have faith in many things: Gravity. Entropy. The sheer perversity of the universe. Human nature. the_child. The love of calendula_witch and so many other people in my life. The healing power of a good pizza. The glory of sex. Tomorrow's sunrise. The value of a good story.

But those are all small-f "faith." And I am a small-a "atheist." Low Church Atheism, I call it in my snarkier moments. No more than daveraines is out to convert me am I out to deconvert him. I firmly believe (have faith?) in our First Amendment freedom of religion. You can believe in YHWH, God, Zeus, Allah, Zoroaster, Gaea, the Flying Spaghetti Monster or the Verruca Gnome for all it matters to me. They're all equally provable assertions, which is to say absolutely unprovable. Your Faith is as important to me as your favorite color. Which is to say, if I like you, I care that you care, but the thing you believe in has zero impact on the real world.

Basically, if you're a person of Faith, unless you're a pagan or a polytheist, I only believe in one less god than you do. Really, we do have a lot in common.

The fact that you believe can have tremendous impact. Viz the Crusades, the Inquisition, the World Trade Center attacks, imprecatory prayer for the death of Senator Byrd. But that's not God talking, that's the insecurities and needs and beliefs of millions of individual people who look to God for comfort, rationale or revenge. Or something. I don't know, I'm not them.

What I do know is that religious belief is strongly privileged in virtually every modern society except some interpretations of the Socialist-Communist spectrum. Our own First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion, but not freedom from religion, which I think would have been far more foresighted of the Founding Fathers.

Faith can reinforce certainty, until we get the lunacy that is modern conservative movement, where politics, culture, a specific swathe of Protestantism and a whole lot of white resentment have been braided together to form a lash that scourges our body politic, sabotages our culture, and makes the United States the laughingstock of the world. Without the strand of Faith in the braid, the whole structure of the post-Nixonian Republican party would have been vastly different, and the world quite possibly would not have suffered the presidencies of Bush the Younger.

Likewise, Faith consistently privileges behaviors that would neurotic or psychotic in any other circumstance. Or simply criminal. From Catholic abuse scandals to snake handling and glossolalia to honor killings, people of faith behave over and over again in manners that would have this atheist locked up, and rightly so. And because it's part of their Faith, their consciences are undisturbed and their lives are called good.

Tell me again why I need Faith? For anything?

So what we have is a gigantic social structure that seems to be as old as human consciousness. It clearly fulfills a vast and fantastic need in the human spirit. And yes, I have a spirit, too. Anyone who's ever read much of my fiction knows that I am on a spiritual quest of my own. I constantly interrogate many of the same questions that Faith is supposed to interrogate. What is my purpose? How am I to act? Why is there good and evil in the world? To whom are my higher loyalties owed? Who is responsible?

Being a rank empiricist and good-hearted skeptic, I can only look for those answers within myself. Sometimes I feel like Jacob wrestling with the angel, in a world innocent of the corrupting touch of God.

I don't lack Faith. To say that implies that Faith is a requirement, or a default condition of being human. I simply don't find any cause to have Faith, any more than I find any cause to believe in the influence of retrograde Mercury on my daily life. And for precisely the same reason. If I lack Faith, I lack it the same way I lack my third hand. It was never a necessary part of me in the first place.

(As an aside, I was raised in Faith, during my early years. My grandfather Lake was a preacher in the Disciples of Christ. I still have a shelf of Bibles and concordances, some of them inscribed with praise for my studies and my knowledge. I even attended missionary schools in my youth. My views of Faith aren't from a lack of exposure, trust me.)

All of which is why I am an atheist. Ultimately because I see no reason not to be, except wishful thinking and the spiritual yearning that all human beings share. Wishful thinking I can dispatch with a wave of my adult hand. Spiritual yearning I address through literature, writing, discourse and thought. Perhaps you could argue I am my own god, but I don't think I'd ever make that claim seriously.

Now to cancer.

As I said yesterday, a well-meaning acquaintance recently told me, "I just don't understand how you can do this without faith in God." I'm not sure if he was referring to my suffering, or the real and significant confrontation with mortality that this disease represents. Perhaps both. I didn't ask, because I like him enough not to want to communicate my sense of insult, and I don't like him so much to want the effort of working through that together.

As an atheist, my simple response might be, "What does God have to do with this?" If God, in the Evangelical Christian sense (his perspective), is real, I could only blame Him for my disease. He is said to act directly in our lives, sending red Mercedes to the deserving and hurricanes to punish the gay. Retail religion, I suppose, and I got handed a rotten apple here at the divine service counter.

Do I need God to blame? No. I don't really need anyone or anything to blame, but I suppose if I do, it's myself and evolution. Colon cancer isn't explicitly a lifestyle cancer, like smoking-related lung cancer, but possibly if I'd eaten a lot less fried food and red meat, and lot more fresh fruits and vegetables, I could have postponed this. I don't carry the known genetic markers (we've checked, and also I have no recent family history). Evolution, well, cancer is a cell division error, fundamentally, a disease of self-repair and reproduction. And what is evolution but cell division accompanied by recombinancy? Welcome to the universe, mister vertebrate. Here's your long odds.

Do I need God to comfort me? No. What comfort would an invisible, unprovable assertion bring me? I have family, friends, lovers, co-workers, readers, fans, and random strangers who offer me far more support and comfort than I know what to do with. No one can reach into my side and still the twanging of the nerves in my ribs right now, not God, not calendula_witch, not my doctors. I can only cope, and work through it. No one can reach into my bloodstream and still the tiny assassin cells that lurk there, waiting to colonize my liver and lungs, except my doctors with their arsenal of drugs. My comfort lies in living, pushing forward, struggling, and perhaps eventually dying with some grace and meaning.

My life does have intent, and purpose. Cancer has focused that to a point beyond pain. Some people find intent and purpose through Faith, and unto them I say, yea, verily, go forth and do what raises your spirit. I cannot see anything in Faith except the barking of carnies and the psychological needs of a lonely ape long lost from his East African plains, and so I find my intent and purpose in myself, in my circle of love and friendship, and ultimately in these words.

Am I richer for it? Who's to say? But I'm happy all by myself, without God. In some ways, happier than I've ever been, right now, with two holes in my left side and four holes in my right side and a medical appliance poking against my throat and some dreadful poisons two weeks in my future.

Are you happy? With or without God? For your sake, I hope like hell it doesn't take cancer for you to answer that question.

Post A Comment | 142 Comments | Add to Memories | Share | Link



Jay Lake
User: jaylake
Date: 2009-12-24 17:32 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
I'm quite aware of the good that churches and people of faith do. But in a world with kids dying of healing through prayer, and Catholic sex abuse, and Wahabbiism, and evolution denialism, and Islamic honor killings, and the murders of healthcare professionals, that's a bit like saying, "Well, I beat my kids, but I also put a roof over their head." The one does not excuse or privilege the other.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



User: daveraines
Date: 2009-12-24 17:45 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
You are aware, perhaps, but you do not cite them, which leads me to believe that in your mind you "privilege" the evil.

It would be interesting to accumulate evidence here. Evil is evil, and any evil is too much, but I suspect the evil is far outweighed by the good. How would one look at the evidence? I wonder how the rate of abuse in the Catholic church compares to that in the school system, for instance? Is "kids dying of healing through prayer" common, or an outlier? So also with the murder of healthcare professionals? Does it matter that the latest murdered doctor was killed in church where he was worshiping?

I am far from arguing that people of faith are all good, all the time; and far from saying that the abuses are insignificant. They are terrible and we as people of faith must not only be deeply ashamed, we must work to clean house. But it is, in my view, incorrect to cite the abuses of faith as the norms of faith.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



Jay Lake
User: jaylake
Date: 2009-12-24 17:50 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
You are absolutely right. I overstated that for rhetorical purposes, as a shortcut to laying out my thinking. The majority, perhaps the vast majority of people doing *anything* are doing it quietly and well -- the faithful, the godless, the liberal, the conservative, the militant, the pacifist.

The point I was reaching for is that faith privileges evil and stupidity in a way that is much harder to do in Enlightenment or post-Enlightment secular society. Evolution denial is a very good example of that. So is the paucity of abortion opponents who do not come from a community of faith, to name a somewhat more controversial and challenging example.

And to me, that is a strike against faith, that it cannot seem to self-correct. I submit that secular society can and does self-correct, or at least has the mechanisms to do so. When your faith tells you are right, in an absolute, moral sense, where is the room for growth or compromise or new understanding? (And yes, many persons in secular society labor under these same absolutes, but they don't have the privileging of "the word of God" to fall back on to justify their inanities and insanities.)
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



barbarienne
User: barbarienne
Date: 2009-12-24 18:41 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
And more to the point is the secular prosecution. Priests and the RC church are being sued, but there isn't much in the way of criminal prosecution. Had the perpetrators been secular schoolteachers, they'd be standing trial and doing jail time, not having their crimes hidden in non-disclosure agreements paid for by bloodgelt.

I am pleased to see at least some cases where secular laws are prosecuting parents for withholding lifesaving medical treatments in the name of religion. The Constitution doesn't guarantee freedom from religion, but neither should it guarantee religion freedom from the law.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



wyld_dandelyon: night is good
User: wyld_dandelyon
Date: 2009-12-25 18:28 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Keyword:night is good
From what I've seen, for the most part, the priests are not being criminally prosecuted because statutes of limitation have expired.

But you know, a normal secular schoolteacher doesn't normally have enough money to make a civil lawsuit worthwhile. The same privilege you complain of is the reason that there is an entity with deep pockets to sue, so that the injured parties have any recourse to gain some kind of reparation at all.

If an ordinary schoolteacher was accused 30 or 40 years after the fact, they would most likely not have even a civil suit filed against them, much less face the possibility of any kind of trial. And so there would be no big-dollar settlement, and nothing exciting about the story. If the news reporters heard about it at all.

I think sometimes the privilege cuts both ways.

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



barbarienne
User: barbarienne
Date: 2009-12-28 17:49 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
I'm sorry, but I can't help reading your last sentence as "Being poor is a privilege."
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



torreybird
User: torreybird
Date: 2009-12-24 18:44 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
It is a strike against faith that some human communities echo-chamber their prejudices into their own reason for action?

IMO, that's the same thing that holds in common through groups of sports fans, political groups, the KKK and Greenpeace - just about every other community that is composed of volunteers. Some of these communities are titularly formed around a concept of faith, but others are not. I think that's evidence that it is human nature to gang up and act based on shared conviction - sometimes a conviction that is made significantly stronger because it exists in a community.

So why blame faith or religion for what is better explained as human nature?
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



cathshaffer
User: cathshaffer
Date: 2009-12-28 23:26 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
I think you are drawing a false dichotomy between faith communities and not-faith. In a nation where more than 90% of people profess some kind of religious belief, there is huge overlap between secular society and faith communities--the same people are comprising both cultures and any "corrections" that happen are a part of both secular and faith dialogues. It is a prejudiced position that one side of the culture war has the ability to "correct" itself and the other does not. Who decides what is correct? Who has the authority to do so?
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



Jay Lake
User: jaylake
Date: 2009-12-29 03:32 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Doesn't organized religion, by definition, present dogma as correct? "Who decides what is correct" seems to be a question missing the point, especially in hierarchical contexts like Catholicism. Or am I missing the point?
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



User: blzblack
Date: 2009-12-24 18:39 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
That's not the same thing. That's like Jay saying, "Hey, I put a roof over my kids' heads." Someone reads that an atheist beat his kids, so they associate you with that other atheist.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



wyld_dandelyon: dragon reading
User: wyld_dandelyon
Date: 2009-12-25 17:39 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Keyword:dragon reading
All faiths, all causes, can be and have been used by the various individuals who invest energy in them for good, for evil, or for a mix. I don't blame all atheists for all the good or evil done by atheists; nor do I blame all Catholic priests for the good or evil done by one of them (and so on).

As a person of faith, I am offended when people do bad things in the name of their religion. It gives religion, all religions, a bad name.

Though really, I see people doing good and bad, and being extreme or being lacadaisical, regardless of what religion they have or don't have. I can't blame religion or lack of it for the good and evil of humanity. It may exacerbate those qualities in some, and/or mellow those qualities in others. But it's folly to say that if people just accepted the right religion, or if they rejected religion that humanity would be better off.

I know you are not saying either. Your balanced, logical viewpoints are part of why I enjoy reading your journal.

But those beliefs are the backdrop that makes it hard for people to feel respected by people whose beliefs differ from their own.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



browse
my journal
links
May 2013
2012 appearances