?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Lakeshore
An author of no particular popularity

Jay Lake
Date: 2007-10-13 08:05
Subject: [politics] Semirandom observations from the progressive perspective
Security: Public
Location:Nuevo Rancho Lake
Mood:going forth
Music:the Child talking about books
Tags:politics
Thinking politics this morning, which probably means I'm not so sick any more. A few observations which have crossed my mind:

The conservative reaction to Al Gore's winning the Nobel Peace Prize is both predictable and telling. Rather than considering that such a substantial endorsement of Gore's work on global warming might merit revisiting both the topic itself and their perception of Gore's credibility, my friends on the right have simply widened their condemnation to include the entire rest of the world.

That's the kind of fixated thinking that lands individuals in the mental health care system. In politics it's called "consistency." What doesn't seem to occur to people who fetishize consistency in their political and moral philosophies is that new evidence can merit re-evaluation. I suppose this comes from the fundamentally prophetic basis of modern conservative thinking. Revelation doesn't admit of revision, at least not openly.

I can see the appeal of conservatism. It must be very comforting to wrap one's soul in the cloak of Truth and not have to worry about the fact that the real world doesn't have bright lines and sharp edges. "I don't do nuance" may as well be the primary plank of the Republican Party.

My other thought is about the oft-repeated complaint that the media has a liberal bias. This probably falls into the category of noticing the sky is blue, but I think when conservatives complain that the media has a liberal bias, what they're reacting to is a lack of sufficient congruency with the things they know to be true. I.e., the media isn't conservative enough. When liberals complain that media has a conservative bias, what they're reacting to is a well-documented overabundance of conservative viewpoints in the anchor chairs, on the mastheads, on the op-ed pages and in column inches. In other the words, the media is too conservative.

That's a nuance, of course.
Post A Comment | 5 Comments | | Flag | Link






S-47/19-J
User: shsilver
Date: 2007-10-13 15:24 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
My other thought is about the oft-repeated complaint that the media has a liberal bias. This probably falls into the category of noticing the sky is blue, but I think when conservatives complain that the media has a liberal bias, what they're reacting to is a lack of sufficient congruency with the things they know to be true. I.e., the media isn't conservative enough. When liberals complain that media has a conservative bias, what they're reacting to is a well-documented overabundance of conservative viewpoints in the anchor chairs, on the mastheads, on the op-ed pages and in column inches. In other the words, the media is too conservative.

What I love is when my Conservative friends claim that the Chicago Tribune, a Republican paper that hasn't endorsed a Democrat for President since it was founded in 1847 (when it was a Whig newspaper), claim that the Tribune is too liberal.
Reply | Thread | Link



Janet Chui
User: marrael
Date: 2007-10-13 15:56 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Reality has a liberal bias.

This drives conservatives crazy.
Reply | Thread | Link



Rafe
User: etcet
Date: 2007-10-13 16:14 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Reality has no bias.

That's what drives conservatives crazy; the mere fact that it's more liberal than they are.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



User: csinman
Date: 2007-10-13 16:22 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Keyword:shai & me
I suppose that since most conservatives are trained from infancy to follow a book that's 2,000 years old (well, the revised edition, anyway), they get in the habit of relying on consistency. If the Holy Bible has been accurate for so long, everything "right" should be accurate for two millennia as well, yeah? ;)

<disclaimer> I'm actually not dissing the Bible; there's a lot of great ideas (and entertainment) within. </disclaimer> But I think this anti-change mindset partially comes from the conservative adherence to that text. There's a difference between science, which is how we track global warming, and spiritual faith, which is what the Bible is supposed to be about.
Reply | Thread | Link



A large duck
User: burger_eater
Date: 2007-10-15 17:30 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Modern conservative thinking summed up:

Nobel Peace Prize = Meaningless political gambit.

American flag lapel pin = Important indicator of patriotic feeling.
Reply | Thread | Link



browse
my journal
links
January 2014
2012 appearances