Jay Lake (jaylake) wrote,
Jay Lake

[process] Sticking to ideas in the face of the shiny

elfs, in response to my recent post about the books queued in my head [ jlake.com | LiveJournal ], asked the the following question:
How do you keep teh shiny at bay, though?

My biggest problem is getting
an idea and having it so overwhelm my thinking process that it derails the WIP. How do you keep that from happening? Your list would (does) slay my productivity with the neurotic notion that I'll let something fade before I've captured it.

To which I responded:
My big secret? If it fades, it wasn't that shiny.

That's why I stopped writing down ideas years ago. If it can't stick in my head, it won't stick in the reader's head.

I only write the ones that really, really insist. And even then, only one at a time. If the next one is still insisting when I'm done, that's pretty much proof positive.

This is an important point, at least for me as a writer. Long time readers of this blog may recall my four rules guidelines of writing. In the original version (linked from that post), number four was "Work on one thing at a time."

"Work on one thing at a time" is a big part of how I handle the issue Elf refers to. Long before I ever sold a damned thing, I used to believe ideas were precious. I wrote them down a lot, in text files and notebooks, long lists of titles, phrases, images, concepts. Eventually I came to realize that for me, ideas are very nearly the most trivial part of the process. Stop me in a hall sometime and ask me for six story ideas. I can give them to you in about a minute, from just looking around.

Obviously, this depends on your definition of "idea". If an idea has to come with an outline, a character, a plot, a resolution, and a fair amount of detail attached, well, no, it doesn't work the way I described. But I can and have written entire novels based on one brief mental image. Virtually all of my short fiction works that way still. It's like the grain of sand at the heart of the pearl — Fred will grow the story if I just bed him with the proper irritant.

Hence my perception of my own process as having been largely based on unconscious competence. It's long been clear to me that I have no real idea what I'm actually doing when I'm writing, since to me, writing is an extension of reading: I am experiencing the story as it hits the page, with many of the same moments of wonder and anger and tension that you the reader (hopefully) will. This is part of why 99% of the time I write in reading order, no matter how nonlinear or complex the plot and structure might be. I don't write fiction so much as channel it, and enjoy the ride along the way.

Parenthetically, this ties to why the process of working on The Heart of the Beast has been so exciting for me. As I've discussed repeatedly [ jlake.com | LiveJournal ], I've much to my surprise developed a stronger sense of conscious control over the fiction and its flow with this project than I ever have possessed before. This in turn gives me a much better set of explicitly supported tools for creating future work.

One way I deal with the shiny of ideas, to point back to Elf's question, is with the cloakroom of ideas. That's me operating metaphor for what I do with cool, shiny things to see if they will stick in my head. I don't need to write them down. Something else cool and shiny will be along shortly — much like drunk drives outside a frat party, there's one every minute. It's ones that stick which count for me. Those I take out and work on, one at a time.

Originally published at jlake.com.

Tags: beast, process, writing

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened