Sobeit. That's the system we live under. During the 43 years I enjoyed the privilege of good health, I didn't question it either. I don't really expect healthy people to question it now. Once you need the system, it's a bit late to start protesting. Frankly, none of us seriously ill people have the time and energy to do so. We're too exhausted trapped in our conditions, and too busy dealing with the Byzantine healthcare and benefits systems. Meanwhile, very few of you healthy people are even aware of the need to do so.
So here's the latest wheeze: Disability benefits.
Like most people with a white collar job, I have coverage for both short term disability (STD — Yes, I know. Quit giggling in the back.) and long term disability (LTD). STD is a benefit my employer provides, LTD is an elective benefit that I pay for with a little dip into every paycheck.
As it happens, determining what qualifies as a disability under either coverage umbrella is a pretty strange process. STD isn't quite as weird as LTD, but it has its quirks. The rules are complex and contradictory, and require cross-referencing different systems and rulesets written to differing standards. In LTD, for example, the question of whether I qualify under the rules of the Social Security Administration (SSA) affects whether or not I will qualify under my private, employer-sponsored, self-paid plan. Likewise, the precise information my physician provides to my health insurance carrier can make a significant difference.
I'm not seeking LTD yet. I don't need it right now. But I am trying to understand the process so that if and when my cancer goes terminal, or if I reach a point where I will likely be in continuous treatment for the rest of my life — either or both of these things are probable in the next year or so — I'd like to know what to do. STD applies to my forthcoming surgery leave, albeit with some weird conditions.
Something cropped up yesterday in the LTD discussion that struck me as especially strange. (My Dad has been researching a lot of this for me. As a retired senior Federal bureaucrat who's managed some very large budgets under Federal accounting rules, as well as living under the strict requirements of high level security clearances for almost four decades, he's quite good at sorting out paperwork and rules.) As it happens, I hold a small LTD plan as a rollover benefit from a job I left over a decade ago. I pay a modest quarterly premium, and the plan will provide me with a modest supplementary income should I ever claim LTD status. Their criteria are, of course, different from that of the SSA or my employer-sponsored plan.
Yesterday, the payroll department at my Day Jobbe informed me that according to the rules of my employer-sponsored LTD plan, any income from other LTD sources, including SSA or my privately-paid LTD plan, will be deducted from my employer-sponsored LTD benefit.
What? The? Hell?
I pointed out that this was both illogical and punitive, and asked what the reasoning was. The response I received was sympathetic but unhelpful. Basically, they don't know, and they also find it weird. To be clear, my employer has been fantastically supportive through these past five years, both in terms of corporate policy and in terms of my individual managers and co-workers. I am very lucky to work where I do. They are not creating this problem in any direct sense. I told payroll I would be consulting an attorney, and they asked me to please share whatever opinion I received with them.
Here's what I see as the problem in this case. If I'm wise and foresighted enough to have a separate LTD benefit paid for privately, what does that have to do with the insurance plan that would pay out my LTD claim? Presumably their premium rates and actuarial calculations are geared toward paying full benefit. My secondary, private plan is essentially income supplementation, as the employer-sponsored LTD pays out at 66-2/3% of my income level. So because I was smart enough to buy "gap" insurance against the possible income loss, now I am to be punished by having the amount of that "gap" benefit deducted to cap me at 66-2/3%? What possible justification is there for this? How is this even legal?
Note that health insurance carriers do something similar, but it's logical enough. They're trying to avoid double paying claims. That makes sense to me. But health insurance plans don't work on a defined benefit basis. They're at-need, and they're paying for that need. With two carriers covering the same patient, they can negotiate amongst themselves as to which carrier will pay what percentage of which needs.
LTD benefits are defined — in my case, 66-2/3% of base salary. Income from other sources is irrelevant to that benefit definition. This would be like your 401(k) provider deducting any other income from your retirement account payout. The LTD benefit is defined, and paid for according to a specific schedule.
I have not yet been able to speak to an attorney. I suspect the answer I'm going to ultimately receive is that this is somehow written into Federal law. This is still an illogical and punitive step on the part of my LTD provider which makes no sense to me. If nothing else, I may as well quit paying the premiums for my private LTD plan, as it is literally useless to me in light of these rules from my employer-sponsored LTD plan.
So, one more example of the kind of weird things sick people have to deal with. While sick and unable to cope with the bizarre details. I'm lucky I have my Dad in the loop, because I can't imagine how I'd be fielding this all by myself along with everything else.