Log in

No account? Create an account
An author of no particular popularity

Jay Lake
Date: 2013-10-17 06:53
Subject: [politics] The shutdown, the ACA, the GOP, and you
Security: Public
Tags:culture, healthcare, politics
So we apparently have a deal to defer the debt limit a month or two down the road and at least temporarily rescind the shutdown. And there was much rejoicing in the land.

I'm not sure what was accomplished here. The only thing that's really changed is a sop to the Republicans about tighter enforcement of the ACA's subsidy provisions. Since this represents a way of further pointlessly punishing the poor, ill and needy, it fits right in with the rest of the Republican party platform.

Meanwhile, I see absolutely no evidence that the Ted Cruz faction of the Senate GOP and the Tea Party faction in Congress aren't going to play exactly the same hostage-taking games in the upcoming budget rounds and debt limit deadline as they just did. In fact, quite the opposite: they're already threatening to do so.

What I've gleaned from the recent fracas is that there are no more 'reasonable Republicans'. Senators McCain, Graham, etc. could have stopped Senator Cruz any time they wanted by not supporting him in procedural votes. The Tea Party caucus in the House is something like 20% of the total Republican delegation, yet the majority-within-a-majority was helpless to deter their unprecedented brinksmanship.

And these 20 percenters somehow imagine that the American people will rise up and back them, if they can only get their message out successfully. They don't believe the polls showing Americans overwhelmingly opposing the shutdown and growing in their support of Obamacare, they don't believe the media reports. It's all a conspiracy to keep the truth away.

Remember how well that denial of media coverage and 'unskewing' of polls worked for the Romney campaign in 2012?

Neither does the House GOP.

They threw almost a million people out of work, did billions of dollars of damage to the economy, made the United States a worldwide laughingstock, all for a conservative temper tantrum about a law they don't like, and apparently to preserve Speaker Boehner's job.

And all of this mess for what? The successful implementation of a healthcare plan first proposed by far right think tank the Heritage Foundation? A healthcare plan first implemented by Republican governor Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, and widely considered highly successful? A law negotiated in the House and Senate incorporating hundreds of Republican amendments to address conservative concerns, gutting the progressive heart of the bill in favor of driving revenue to private sector health insurance carriers?

In other words, the Republicans were rising up against their own idea, implemented with their own advice and consent and thorough bipartisan negotiation, litigated before their own ideologically stacked Roberts Court, successfully implemented by a black Democrat.

Government keep yore Hands of my Medicare

Guess which part of that preceding paragraph is the real issue. As Senator McConnell flatly said in 2010, the GOP's top legislative priority during Obama's first term was to make him a one-term president. Not jobs. Not national security. Not the economy. No, their priority was limiting the success of a black Democrat.

Why would anyone think their priorities are different now? Allowing the ACA to succeed, no matter how deeply rooted it is in conservative ideals, brings political and historical credibility to President Obama.

And the GOP's insistence that the shutdown was Obama's fault because of his unreasonable refusal to negotiate doesn't even rise to the level of the laugh test. To anyone outside the conservative epistemological bubble, the hostage taking-dynamic is overwhelmingly obvious. Your Liberal Media has seriously confused the issue by pretending that this is a both-sides-do-it issue.

The worst part is, the GOP has gone so crazy that they are imperiling the full faith and credit of the United States government in international finance. There may already be long term damage. And by the GOP's own logic, any existing law they don't like can be protested by the same measure. These idiots could shut down the government in an attempt to defund the Environmental Protection Agency, or dismantle Social Security. American conservatives have proven they will hold the entire country hostage over settled law. What's to stop them from doing it again?

Bad enough that the party that wraps itself in the flag and the Constitution and angrily proclaims the supremacy of conservative patriotism destroyed our military reputation during the George W. Bush administration. Now they're hell-bent on destroying our economic dominance of the world, with a side order of collapse of our world-leading educational and scientific establishments. Strange behavior for a party that insists on America First!

Like I said, I've given up on 'reasonable Republicans.' All the nice, humane, thoughtful conservatives I know in real life are people who vote for the party of hostage taking, of destroying the economy and America's standing in the world, of the sheer, wall-eyed lunacy of Bachmann and Gohmert and DeMint and Cruz. Given that the crazies have taken over the party, after being invited into the tent these past years, anyone who votes Republican is part of the problem we have just seen on display.

The problem we will see come back with a vengeance in December, January and February as the new deadlines in the continuing resolution come to pass. Meanwhile, the sequester budget has become the new normal — a huge win for Republicans — while science is foundering and our international financial posture is collapsing.

All this from a bunch of patriots, who themselves are an ever-shrinking minority of American culture and politics. If the GOP can't win, it's clearly intent on taking the rest of us down with it.

And in a year, when the next round of Congressional elections is held, will anyone even remember this? No, most of Sarah Palin's "real Americans" will be out voting against the party that put a black man in the White House. And given the Democrat's temerity to win an election by the popular vote, on the merits of their positions, Obama and the rest of this country will pay and pay and pay for the angry conservative inability to accept that they have lost the culture and political wars.

Get a Brain! Morans

Photos snurched from publicly available Internet sources, copyright their respective owners.

Post A Comment | 9 Comments | | Link

Debbie N.
User: wild_irises
Date: 2013-10-17 14:56 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
The brilliant Ta-Nehisi Coates has convinced me never to call these people patriots, even ironically.

If a patriot can stand in front of the White House brandishing the Confederate flag, then the word "patriot" has no meaning. The Nazi flag is offensive because it is a marker of centuries of bigotry elevated to industrialized murder.

But the Confederate flag does not merely carry the stain of slavery, of "useful killing," but the stain of attempting to end the Union itself. You cannot possibly wave that flag and honestly claim any sincere understanding of your country. It is not possible.
Reply | Thread | Link

Richard Parks: pic#98248748
User: ogre_san
Date: 2013-10-17 16:28 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Not to excuse the looney GOP--for which there is no excuse--but Obama has to share some of the blame for enabling them. I remember how things were when he was first elected--the Dems were energized and the GOP in disarray. So what did he do? He offered them a hand up. He took their economy-killing proposals seriously, he compromised continually and gave the GOP the idea that they could get anything they wanted out of him in the name of "bipartisanship." They took that hand up and then they bit it. And then they did it again. And again. Obama kept offering it, to the point that I was seriously starting to wonder if HE might be the delusional one. Then came the first threatened shut-down and Obama and the Dems caved, pure and simple. The end result was that the GOP was re-energized and the Dems in disarray. Naturally the GOP thought they could do it again, and why not? It was one of the few times when (recent) history was actually on their side.

It took him five frickin' years, but Obama finally--it seems--learned his lesson. If he'd learned it a lot sooner we might not have had to go through this mess.
Reply | Thread | Link

Jay Lake
User: jaylake
Date: 2013-10-17 16:33 (UTC)
Oh, agreed. But consider that Obama's mistake was assuming that the GOP was acting from either principle or goodwill. There are worse mistakes, I suppose.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link

LiveJournal: pingback_bot
User: livejournal
Date: 2013-10-17 19:00 (UTC)
Subject: My tweets
User twilight2000 referenced to your post from My tweets saying: [...] ! [politics] The shutdown, the ACA, the GOP, and youhttp://jaylake.livejournal.com/3305336.html [...]
Reply | Thread | Link

User: lindadee
Date: 2013-10-17 20:25 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Well said. I think you should send this to the newspaper as an op-ed piece.
Reply | Thread | Link

User: msconduct
Date: 2013-10-17 22:15 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
FWIW, I don't think the rest of the world has been laughing. We find the whole thing as bemusing and alarming and shocking as you do.
Reply | Thread | Link

User: history_monk
Date: 2013-10-17 23:05 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
The lesson the rest of the world learned from the Bush 43 presidency was "The USA is only ever one election away from a government like this? ... be careful with any long-term plans that involve the US."

And now the lesson is "The government is capable of shutting down at short notice, and when it does that, it won't be paying much attention to anything except itself." I really doubt the lesson is lost on the enemies of the US, and I also doubt that these situations would be terribly hard for an opponent with money and brains to create via a bit of lobbying and a few created news stories.
Reply | Thread | Link

User: ulfhirtha
Date: 2013-10-17 23:35 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Indeed, I think also that is a lesson learned by the rest of the world in general. Countries that receive (let alone rely) on our foreign aid and even our attention now see that they cannot depend on it. We are the world's abusive boyfriend or manic-depressive aunt.

The US has shown that it is no longer a reliable country in numerous areas that underpin the global economy let alone geopolitics and security. I was reading earlier about fund administrators being sure not to hold an Treasury bonds that would come due in October or Novemeber just to be out of the way of this latest possible trainwreck and I would not be surprised if steps start to be taken in other areas to minimize the damage another US flake-out produces.

Such behavior is only possible due to the reserves and buffers of both finance and forebearance we have built laboriously but they can be strained and exhausted. Perhaps people have the medieval mindset that Things Will Always Be This Way and the US will be permanently dominant so they can abuse it as they will. But one thing the last 100 years shows is how swiftly and completely everything can change. Ask the Kaiser.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link

Agent Mimi
User: agent_mimi
Date: 2013-10-18 02:04 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
I really doubt the lesson is lost on the enemies of the US

Absolutely. I recall articles and editorials that made a pretty good case of showing that the public opinion of Bush, the contested election, the protests against Bush II at his inauguration, plus his well-publicized penchant for frequent vacations, were also not lost on the country's enemies back in 2001. Nowadays, we're always teetering on the precipice of financial disaster, and some politicians are clearly trying to push the US over the edge, and I can't imagine what other countries are thinking besides, "That is clinically insane."
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link

my journal
January 2014
2012 appearances